ArticleScientific reports2026
Bis-1,2,4-triazole derivatives as potential antioxidants for pneumonia therapy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the antioxidant and predicted anti‑virulence potential of six novel bis‑1,2,4‑triazole derivatives for pneumonia therapy. All compounds were synthesized and evaluated in vitro against the DPPH radical; the half‑maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC₅₀) ranged from 45.1 to 108.7 µg/mL, with compounds 2 and 6 showing the lowest values and approaching the efficacy of ascorbic acid. The structural motifs of a flexible hexyl chain in compound 2 and a para‑nitrophenyl group in compound 6 appear to enhance radical‑scavenging potency. Molecular docking across the series yielded predicted binding affinities to pneumococcal virulence factors neuraminidase A (NanA) and pneumolysin (Ply) between − 5.6 and − 8,. kcal/mol; compounds 2 and 6 exhibited the most favourable docking scores (up to − 8.1 kcal/mol) and formed multiple stabilising hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts within the active sites. All compounds were compared with ascorbic acid in statistical analyses, and the IC₅₀ values of 2 and 6 were significantly different (p < 0.05) from the reference. In silico ADMET profiling of the entire series indicated high gastrointestinal absorption, low predicted toxicity, absence of hERG inhibition, and minimal CYP450 inhibition, supporting their drug‑likeness. To our knowledge this is the first report evaluating bis‑1,2,4‑triazoles as dual antioxidant and anti‑virulence agents for pneumonia; the findings justify further optimisation and biological testing, including cytotoxicity assays in A549 cells and in vivo pneumonia models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.