Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41547703›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Ambulation improves memory for rotated scenes.

Sabina Srokova, Matthew F Watson, Melanie K Gin, Arne D Ekstrom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sabina SrokovaPsychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-8659
Matthew F WatsonPsychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Melanie K GinPsychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Arne D EkstromPsychology Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. adekstrom@arizona.edu.

Funding

NEUROBEHAVIORAL RELATIONS IN SENESCENT HIPPOCAMPUSR01AG003376 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO AT BOULDER · PI BARNES, CAROL A. · 1985 to 2025
$16.4M
Postdoctoral Training, Neurobiology of Aging and Alzheimer's DiseaseT32AG044402 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CAROL A. BARNES · 2016 to 2026
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG003376NIA NIH HHS T32 AG044402NIH/NIA R01AG003376NIH/NIA T32AG044402
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the real world, memory and navigation operate through the interplay between visual, proprioceptive, and vestibular systems to give rise to multimodal spatial representations of the environment. However, it remains unclear in what situations the absence of ambulatory cues might affect spatial memory, particularly given the widespread use of desktop virtual reality (VR) in studies of human spatial memory and navigation. In the present study, we employ ambulatory and immersive VR technology to probe people's memory for spatial layouts across the same or rotated perspectives. Critically, we explored whether cognitive processes underlying spatial memory for perspective change differ depending on whether self-motion cues are available to support performance (i.e., when perspective changes due to observer movement as opposed to display rotation). Leveraging the wealth of behavioral data that can be obtained from immersive VR technology, we demonstrate that self-motion cues enhance spatial memory accuracy by shaping the temporal dynamics of decision making, pupillary responses, and eye-movement behaviors. This study highlights the importance of integrating naturalistic movement cues, particularly those involving rotation, into ecologically valid paradigms which will enable further advancements of theories on real-world navigation.

Indexed as

Space PerceptionSpatial MemoryVirtual RealityWalkingAdultCuesFemaleHumansMalePupilRotationYoung AdultAmbulationImmersive virtual realitySpatial memory

Identifiers

PMID41547703
PMCPMC13012659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.