Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41547701›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Letter matching in word familiarity: Is slot overlap or relative position overlap a requirement?

Andrew M Huebert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Andrew M HuebertDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi, 118 College Drive, Hattiesburg, MS, 39406, USA. andrew.huebert@usm.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Familiarity is the sense that something has been encountered before, either prior to or without being able to recall specifics of the previous encounter. Familiarity is thought to be driven by an overlap in features between stimuli recently activated in memory and the current stimulus. Research on word familiarity suggests that letters are a significant contributing feature. An unexplored question is the extent to which letter overlap needs to occur in the same positions between the initial encounter and the later encounter. Research on priming and lexical decision suggests that letters do not need to be in the exact correct locations for lexical activation to occur. Based on this research, two experiments are reported investigating how letter position matching might operate in word familiarity using a variant of recognition without cued recall. The results suggested that neither absolute nor relative position overlap were needed for some degree of letter matching to occur. Letters that were out of position that also did not maintain relative positions still contributed to word familiarity. Implications for the mechanism behind letter matching, as well as for other kinds of stimuli, are discussed.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualReadingRecognition, PsychologyAdultHumansYoung AdultFamiliarityFeature matchingLettersRecognition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.