ArticleBMJ open2026
Heterogeneity in job preferences among young physicians in Chinese tertiary hospitals: a discrete choice experiment.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysicians' preferences for financial and non-financial incentives significantly influence their job satisfaction and career choices. A comprehensive understanding of these preferences can aid in the optimisation of incentive policies. While prior studies have examined these preferences using discrete choice experiments (DCEs), the effects of intrinsic motivations, such as altruism and job satisfaction, on incentive responsiveness remain poorly understood. Understanding this heterogeneity is essential for designing incentive policies that are effective and tailored to the healthcare context in China. This study aimed to assess how physicians' altruism and job satisfaction shape their preferences for financial and non-financial incentives.
methodsThis study employed a DCE methodology and surveyed 886 physicians from urban tertiary hospitals. The DCE design was based on a comprehensive literature review and focus group interviews, assessing physicians' preferences regarding attributes such as work environment, workload, career development opportunities and career identity. Mixed logit models were used to estimate the willingness to pay for each attribute and analyse heterogeneity across subgroups based on levels of altruism and job satisfaction.
resultsFinancial incentives were the most important factor for physicians, followed by attributes such as work atmosphere and workload. On average, physicians expressed a willingness to sacrifice 4859.035 ¥ for an improved work atmosphere and 4335.008 ¥ in exchange for reduced workload. Subgroup analysis showed that physicians with low- and medium-altruism prioritised improvements related to working conditions, while those with high-altruism placed greater emphasis on intrinsic career development and career identity. Furthermore, physicians reporting low-job satisfaction demonstrated heightened sensitivity to both financial and non-financial incentives, whereas those with high-job satisfaction showed weaker preference for financial incentives and greater preference for improvements in work atmosphere (
conclusionThe findings highlight the need to align incentive policies with physicians' intrinsic motivations and current job satisfaction. Financial incentives remain a key driver of job preferences. Non-financial factors, including improvements in the work atmosphere, work environment, workload, career development and professional identity, also play an important role in supporting physicians' job satisfaction and retention. Considering differences in altruism and job satisfaction can help healthcare institutions and policymakers develop more targeted and context-specific incentive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.