SynthesisBiological psychiatry2026
The Relationship Between Family History of Depression and Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Large Cohorts.
Synthesis in Biological psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Family history (FH) of major depression is a well-replicated risk factor for developing the disorder. Studying individuals who may be at high familial risk but are symptom free may allow us to better distinguish mechanisms predisposing individuals to depression from mechanisms that arise from having the disorder. Neuroimaging studies using such high-risk designs have suggested several cortical and subcortical regions that may contribute to depression susceptibility; however, specificity, timing of mechanisms, and long-term clinical implications remain unclear. As developing de novo cohorts to address these questions would be resource intensive, we sought to identify existing longitudinal cohorts that could be used to examine the effects of FH on brain imaging outcomes rigorously and cost-effectively, to determine the way FH was assessed in these cohorts, and to summarize their major findings published to date. A structured PubMed search identified 25 longitudinal cohorts (13 countries), each containing ≥1000 participants, direct- or informant-based FH, psychiatric measures, and ≥1 magnetic resonance imaging collection. Across publications from these cohorts, subcortical (particularly striatum, amygdala) and cortical (anterior cingulate, prefrontal) regions most frequently showed alterations in association with familial risk. However, current evidence for whether these regions predict psychopathology is limited, and the question should be examined in future studies as offspring in these cohorts age. This comprehensive review should also serve as a resource for further analyses of existing data from cohorts with FH and neuroimaging data in the context of depression and other disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.