ArticleEJNMMI physics2026
SMGDiff: step mapping generalized diffusion model for efficient noise reduction in cardiac-gated myocardial perfusion SPECT images.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundImproving the image quality of cardiac gating myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (CG MP-SPECT) is crucial for accurate diagnosis. Diffusion model (DM) has recently shown promise in MP-SPECT image denoising, but traditional DM typically require extensive computational resources and prolonged processing times. The study aims to develop and evaluate a lightweight generalized DM for efficient denoising in CG MP-SPECT images.
methodsWe propose a novel step mapping generalized diffusion model (SMGDiff) that incorporates cardiac-gated MP-SPECT images as diffusion endpoints instead of traditional Gaussian noise, alongside a novel mean-preserving degradation operator to significantly reduce sampling steps and inference time. Additionally, a stepwise mapping and error optimization module (SMEO) was designed to precisely calibrate stepwise features using contextual information, thereby minimizing cumulative errors during reconstruction. A retrospective dataset of 50 MP-SPECT scans from 36 patients was used, each gated into 8 (CG-8) or 16 (CG-16) cardiac phases, generating 400/800 image pairs for CG-8/CG-16, respectively. The dataset was divided into training (35 scans), validation (5 scans), and testing (10 scans). Peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), normalized mean square error (NMSE), joint histogram, linear regression analysis and a paired two-tail t-test were employed for quantitative evaluation. Two board-certified nuclear medicine physicians performed a blinded and randomized reader study on resulted images. Images were rated on 5-point Likert scales for image quality and diagnostic confidence, with significance evaluated by Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.
resultsThe SMGDiff model with 5 diffusion steps (SMGDiff-5) achieved the best overall performance across all evaluation metrics for both gating configurations. SMGDiff-5 also demonstrated superior computational efficiency, requiring only 0.024 s per slice compared to 4.982 s for the 1000-step diffusion model. Furthermore, SMGDiff-5 significantly outperformed established deep learning methods including CNN, U-Net, GAN, and the denoising diffusion probabilistic model, as evidenced by higher PSNR and SSIM and lower NMSE (p < 0.05). Joint histogram and linear regression analyses confirmed these quantitative findings. Reader study results aligned with the quantitative trends which SMGDiff-5 received the highest or near-reference ratings for image quality (CG-8 4.725; CG-16 4.550) and diagnostic confidence (CG-8 4.600; CG-16 4.525), clearly above original gated images and comparable to static MP-SPECT.
conclusionsThe proposed SMGDiff-5 model provides robust and efficient denoising of CG MP-SPECT images, offering superior performance compared to traditional deep learning methods with significantly reduced computational demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.