Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41546822›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology2026

Technical considerations in endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: A comprehensive review.

Kalpit Devani, Vishal Seth, Sanjay Rajput, Radhika Chavan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kalpit DevaniDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Prisma Health, University of South Carolina, School of Medicine, Greenville, SC, USA.
Vishal SethDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Katraj, Pune 411 043, India.
Sanjay RajputDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Ansh Clinic, Ahmedabad 380 008, India.
Radhika ChavanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Bharati Vidyapeeth, Katraj, Pune 411 043, India. drradhikachavan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5363-597X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver biopsy continues to serve as a cornerstone in the evaluation of diffuse and unexplained liver disease, yet the percutaneous and trans-jugular routes are limited by safety concerns, patient acceptability and sampling variability. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has emerged as a safe and effective alternative, offering real-time access to both lobes and the opportunity to combine tissue acquisition with other endoscopic interventions. This review summarizes current evidence on EUS-LB, with focus on technical considerations including needle design, gauge, number of passes and actuations, suction techniques and specimen handling. Reported diagnostic adequacy consistently meets or exceeds established histologic benchmarks, while adverse event rates are comparable to percutaneous and trans-jugular biopsy. Bleeding is the most notable complication, though it is uncommon and usually self-limiting. Beyond tissue acquisition, the concept of EUS as a "one-stop" platform-integrating biopsy, portal pressure gradient measurement, elastography and therapeutic interventions is gaining importance. With ongoing refinements and accumulating supportive data, EUS-LB is increasingly recognized as a versatile, minimally invasive and comprehensive tool in hepatology.

Indexed as

Endoscopic ultrasoundEUS-LBFine-needle biopsyHepatologyLiver biopsyTechnical considerations

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.