SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026
A review of remote sensing technology for plastic waste monitoring.
Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plastic waste pollution has become a critical environmental challenge that requires innovative monitoring approaches to support effective environmental management. This systematic review synthesizes recent advancements in remote sensing (RS) technologies for plastic waste detection, analyzing 84 studies published between 2018 and 2024 following PRISMA guidelines. The review evaluates RS platforms, sensor types, spectral ranges, classification methods, and polymer identification across diverse environmental settings. Satellite platforms dominate large-scale marine monitoring (45% of studies), while unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) excelled in high-resolution coastal applications (23%). Correspondence analysis identified four distinct research clusters optimized for specific platform-environment combinations. Supervised learning was most prevalent (50%), though deep learning approaches and hybrid models show emerging promise. Polyethylene was most frequently detected across platforms. Limitation of the research field includes geographic bias towards European sites (> 50%), focus on controlled conditions rather than operational deployment, inability to detect microplastics, and lack of standardized protocols. The review also highlights emerging developments in RS technologies, including spectral mechanisms that support polymer discrimination and ongoing gaps in plastic monitoring. An integrated framework is proposed that combines multi-platform Earth Observation (EO), machine learning, and citizen science to enable scalable plastic waste monitoring. The findings provide theoretical and practical insights to guide future sensor design, algorithm development, and global monitoring strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.