Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41546767›Full record

SynthesisEnvironmental science and pollution research international2026

A review of remote sensing technology for plastic waste monitoring.

Yootthapoom Potiracha, Roger C Baars

Abstract readSystematic ReviewReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yootthapoom PotirachaGraduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan. yootthapoom.potiracha.23m@st.kyoto-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6240-2248
Roger C BaarsGraduate School of Global Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plastic waste pollution has become a critical environmental challenge that requires innovative monitoring approaches to support effective environmental management. This systematic review synthesizes recent advancements in remote sensing (RS) technologies for plastic waste detection, analyzing 84 studies published between 2018 and 2024 following PRISMA guidelines. The review evaluates RS platforms, sensor types, spectral ranges, classification methods, and polymer identification across diverse environmental settings. Satellite platforms dominate large-scale marine monitoring (45% of studies), while unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) excelled in high-resolution coastal applications (23%). Correspondence analysis identified four distinct research clusters optimized for specific platform-environment combinations. Supervised learning was most prevalent (50%), though deep learning approaches and hybrid models show emerging promise. Polyethylene was most frequently detected across platforms. Limitation of the research field includes geographic bias towards European sites (> 50%), focus on controlled conditions rather than operational deployment, inability to detect microplastics, and lack of standardized protocols. The review also highlights emerging developments in RS technologies, including spectral mechanisms that support polymer discrimination and ongoing gaps in plastic monitoring. An integrated framework is proposed that combines multi-platform Earth Observation (EO), machine learning, and citizen science to enable scalable plastic waste monitoring. The findings provide theoretical and practical insights to guide future sensor design, algorithm development, and global monitoring strategies.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPlasticsRemote Sensing TechnologyPlasticsCitizen scienceEarth observationEnvironmental assessmentMachine learningPlastic waste monitoringRemote sensing

Identifiers

PMID41546767
PMCPMC12891012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.