ArticleActa neuropathologica2026
Germline variants in ATM, BRCA2, other cancer predisposition and novel candidate genes are implicated in glioma risk in adult glioma patients with a familial or personal history of tumors.
Article in Acta neuropathologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Familial occurrence of gliomas has been reported in around 5% of patients. Studies on the genetic landscape of glioma predisposition are scarce. Here, leukocyte DNA of 213 adult glioma patients with a familial and/or personal tumor history from 206 families was subjected to whole-exome sequencing. Germline variants (GVs) were analyzed using two approaches: (1) GVs in 164 established cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) or suspected glioma risk genes were extracted and classified; (2) the enrichment of genes with loss-of-function or deleterious missense GVs that were ultrarare or ClinVar likely pathogenic/pathogenic in the glioma versus a control cohort (n = 391) was determined. In 23% (48/213) of glioma patients with a familial/personal tumor history, GVs predicted to be deleterious in CPGs were detected. Of the mutated CPGs, 37% were involved in DNA damage response, including ATM, BRCA2, PMS2, POLE. ATM GVs (n = 6) preferentially predisposed to IDH-mutant astrocytoma (P = 0.007) in patients that were significantly younger at diagnosis than patients without GVs (P = 0.022). BRCA2 GVs (n = 5) were also significantly enriched in glioma patients in approach 2 (P = 0.005). The other mutated CPGs, glioma risk or enriched novel genes play roles in diverse processes, including metabolism and signal transduction. Syn-/metachronous non-brain tumors were diagnosed in 29% of glioma patients with GVs. In 11% of patients, the identified CPG GVs potentially sensitized to targeted therapies, such as PARP, immune checkpoint, or EGFR inhibitors. In conclusion, our study identifies CPGs and novel genes relevant in germline testing of glioma patients with a familial/personal tumor history, possibly resulting in targeted treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.