Trial reportWorld journal of urology2026
Initial results with an absorbable urologic scaffold to mitigate early urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy: the ARID study.
Trial report in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06275945 (Feasibility Study of A VoRo UrologIc ScaffolD for the Prophylactic Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility Study of A VoRo UrologIc ScaffolD for the Prophylactic Treatment of Post-Prostatectomy Stress Urinary Incontinence
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond Surgical Technique: Evolving Strategies to Reduce Urinary Incontinence After Radical Prostatectomy.Current urology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a frequent adverse effect following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer. Causes include urethra shortening, bladder neck widening and diminished urethral support. An implantable, absorbable urologic scaffold has been developed to elongate the urethra and provide radial support to the bladder neck and urethral stump, at the time of RARP.
methodsProspective, non-randomized, single-arm early feasibility study with the urologic scaffold placed during RARP. While not sufficiently powered, endpoints were device safety and continence rate at differing timepoints up to 6 months. Continence was rigorously defined as return to pre-surgery pad weight, inclusive of measurement error, using 24-hour pad weight testing.
resultsTwenty-four subjects with a mean age of 62.9 ± 7.4 years and BMI of 27.1 ± 3.5 were enrolled. No device-related adverse events were reported. Half of the subjects were continent upon catheter removal with 52.2% and 76.2% being continent at 6 weeks and 6 months based on 24-hour pad weight. A sub-analysis of subjects with sub-optimally placed device confirmed by video review showed 80.0% and 92.9% continence rates at 6 weeks and 6 months for subjects with correctly placed devices compared to 0% and 42.9% when sub-optimally placed.
conclusionEarly experience from a first-in-human with an absorbable urologic scaffold demonstrated no adverse events associated with the device. Observed patient outcomes suggest that the device reduces SUI following RARP when properly placed. Longer term results from this study and an ongoing randomized controlled trial will further define the device's role in reducing SUI after RARP. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06275945.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.