Observational studyWorld journal of urology2026
Barriers to post-prostatectomy stress incontinence care: knowledge gaps, patient concerns, and urologist communication.
Observational study in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Unexpected Cause of De Novo Urge Incontinence Following Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeStress urinary incontinence (SUI) after radical prostatectomy markedly reduces quality of life, yet care gaps remain. This study evaluated patients' knowledge of treatment options and use of continence aids.
methodsWe analysed follow-up data from the multicentre HAROW study (2013-2018) and a cross-sectional study from Dresden (2021). Included were men up to 15 years after prostatectomy using ≥ 2 pads daily. The survey examined awareness of surgical treatments, continence aids, information sources, and barriers to therapy.
resultsNinety-nine patients participated (HAROW: 62; Dresden: 37). Median age at surgery was 67 years (47-85); median postoperative interval 11 years (0-15). Continuous leakage was reported by 70% (68/97), and 53% (51/96) used > 3 pads/day. Pads were the main aid (97%, 93/96); condom catheters (12%) and penile clamps (2%) were rarely used, with 86% unaware of these options. Knowledge of surgical treatments was absent in 62% (55/89). Better awareness was linked to younger age (p = 0.002) and fewer pads used (p = 0.04). Urologists were the main information source (88%), followed by treating hospital (50%) and partners (44%). Key reasons for not seeking surgery were sufficient coping with pads (69%), doubts about efficacy (55%), and fear of health risks (44%).
conclusionMost men with SUI after prostatectomy remain poorly informed about surgical options despite frequent urologist consultations. Fear and misconceptions limit therapy uptake. Structured, targeted education is needed to bridge the gap between clinical need and treatment, potentially improving utilization and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.