ArticleACS nano2026
Solid Electrolyte Interphase and Interface Effect on the Nucleation of Lithium Pitting.
Article in ACS nano, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nucleation of pits and their evolution on the lithium (Li) metal anode greatly impact the cyclability and safety of Li-metal batteries. Overpotential has been found to be inversely related to the Li pit radius and exponentially related to the nucleation rate. However, it remains unclear how the electrode/electrolyte interphase and interface impact the nucleation of pitting. In this study, we decouple the electrolyte effect into a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and interface charge transfer (CT). Under galvanostatic stripping, ether electrolytes yield larger and sparser pits than the carbonate electrolyte, which is related to the lower stripping overpotential of ether electrolytes. Under potentiostatic stripping, a smaller pit size and higher nucleation density have been revealed in ether electrolytes due to the higher nucleation rate. We found that charge-transfer kinetics on the interface of the Li-metal anode will greatly influence its nucleation mode and kinetics. Slow charge-transfer kinetics in the carbonate electrolyte lead to a lower nucleation rate and larger Li pits, which are close to 3D nucleation. In ether electrolytes with fast charge transfer kinetics, the pitting process exhibits 2D nucleation. The SEI derived from various electrolytes mainly influences the stripping overpotential and the morphology of the pits. By clarifying the roles of SEI and interfacial charge transfer on the nucleation of pitting, this work will greatly benefit the design of cycling profiles and electrolyte recipes for next-generation Li-metal batteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.