ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2026
Atrial fibrillation ablation using three-dimensional artificial intelligence module integration with intracardiac echocardiography.
Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Intracardiac Echocardiography during Invasive Electrophysiological Procedures: a Scientific Statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC, and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions of the ESC.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Guideline
- Artificial intelligence technology in aortic valve disease: a decade of scientometric and narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence-intracardiac echocardiography-guided pulsed field ablation of atrial fibrillation with variable-loop circular catheter.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Accuracy of a Deep Learning Model in Intracardiac Echocardiography.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Atrial fibrillation ablation using three-dimensional artificial intelligence module integration with intracardiac echocardiography.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIntracardiac echocardiography-based electroanatomical mapping (EAM) improves procedural efficiency and safety in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and remains the standard of care. The CARTOSOUND FAM (AI FAM) module uses a deep-learning algorithm that automates left atrial reconstruction without manual contouring. This study aims to evaluate the 1-year outcomes of AI FAM compared to standard-of-care EAM in AF ablation. METHODS AND
resultsThis study included 298 patients undergoing radiofrequency AF ablation between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients treated before January 2023 underwent standard-of-care EAM, while those in 2023 utilized AI FAM-based reconstruction. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, AF type, and medication use were recorded. Procedural characteristics, acute success, complications, and AF recurrence at 1-year follow-up were analysed. Of the 298 patients, 115 underwent mapping with AI FAM and 183 with EAM. Baseline characteristics were comparable. AI FAM reduced mean total procedure time (122.5 ± 23.5 vs. 129.0 ± 30.4 min, P = 0.040) and left atrial (LA) dwell time (78.3 ± 21.45 vs. 87.5 ± 28.2 min, P = 0.001). Acute procedural success was 98.3% in AI FAM vs. 98.9% in EAM with fewer complications observed in the AI FAM group (1 vs. 4). At 1 year, freedom from AF recurrence was comparable (80.0% AI FAM vs. 81.4% EAM at 1 year, LogRank P = 0.610).
conclusionAI FAM was associated with incremental but significant procedural advantages over conventional contouring via reduced total procedure time and LA dwell time, without compromising acute and long-term safety and rhythm control efficacy. AI FAM integration with pulsed field ablation will mark another step towards making AF ablation more streamlined and accessible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.