Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41546531›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2026

Personalized Antibiogram: A Novel Multitask Machine Learning Framework for Simultaneous Prediction of Antimicrobial Resistance Profile With Enhanced Detection of Carbapenem Resistance in Enterobacteriaceae.

Michihiko Goto, Anindita Bandyopadhyay, Qianyi Shi, Yaohua Wang, Eli N Perencevich, David Hernandez, W Nick Street

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Michihiko GotoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-5613
Anindita BandyopadhyayDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4881-1139
Qianyi ShiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Yaohua WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-7214-1176
Eli N PerencevichDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
David HernandezCenter for Access & Delivery Research and Evaluation (CADRE), Iowa City Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
W Nick StreetDepartment of Business Analytics, University of Iowa Tippie College of Business, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.

Funding

AHRQ HHS K08 HS027472AHRQ HHS K08HS027472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional hospital antibiograms summarize aggregated resistance rates, limiting their utility for individualized antimicrobial selection. Existing statistical and machine learning models predict each phenotype separately, ignoring correlations among resistance profiles. We developed novel multitask extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models utilizing structured data in electronic health records (EHRs) to predict resistance to 8 antimicrobial classes simultaneously and evaluated their performance within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. isolates collected at 127 hospitals and >1400 clinics from January 2017 to September 2024. Data from January 2017 to September 2023 were used for model development, while data from October 2023 to September 2024 were used for simulated prospective testing. Model performances were compared to hospital antibiograms and single-target XGBoost models.

resultsThe training cohort included 536 252 E. coli and 246 898 Klebsiella spp. isolates; the test cohort included 75 138 and 38 015 isolates, respectively. On the test data, the multitask model achieved overall areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROCs) of 0.779 (E. coli) and 0.810 (Klebsiella spp.), with good to excellent per-class performance (AUROC range, 0.743-0.847). A multitask approach improved calibration and decreased false-negative rates for carbapenem resistance while predicting individualized resistance probabilities for all target antimicrobials simultaneously ("personalized antibiograms").

conclusionsA multitask XGBoost framework can accurately predict individualized resistance profiles for common Gram-negative pathogens, outperforming conventional antibiograms and single-target models. Personalized antibiograms may enhance the selection of empiric therapy, including the detection of carbapenem resistance in low-endemicity settings.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenem-Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterobacteriaceaeMachine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEscherichia coliHumansKlebsiellaMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPredictive Learning ModelsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsantimicrobial resistance predictionelectronic health record dataGram-negative rodsmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID41546531
PMCPMC13393128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.