ArticleJournal of psychiatric and mental health nursing2026
Perspectives and Experiences of Nurses Implementing the Safe Steps for De-Escalation in Acute Mental Health Units.
Article in Journal of psychiatric and mental health nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- De-Escalation in United Kingdom Inpatient Mental Health Care: A Structured Critical Narrative Synthesis of People, Capability and Context.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Review
- Perspectives and Experiences of People Receiving Care on a De-escalation Intervention to Reduce Restrictive Practices in Acute Mental Health Units.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- From Control to Connection: Reflections on Implementing Safe Steps in Acute Mental Health Units.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Functional, Contextual, and Interventional Drivers of Formal Coercion in Acute Mental Health Units: A Feature Analysis.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionEfforts to reduce restrictive practices in acute mental health units require more than operational reform; they also need to give voice to clinicians who implement these changes.
aimThis paper forms part of a broader evaluation of the Safe Steps for De-escalation, which was aimed at investigating the impact of the Safe Steps implementation on the perceived professional quality of life of the nurse participants. This paper also presents a qualitative assessment of the process, aimed at identifying the factors that influence the successful implementation of the Safe Steps from the perspective of the nurse participants.
methodsSafe Steps is a structured approach for de-escalation, intended to reduce restrictive practices and promote the development and maintenance of therapeutic relationships, as well as individuals' self-management. It was implemented in three adult inpatient units in New South Wales, Australia, from March 2024 to April 2025. This paper was nested within a mixed concurrent control study and was informed by a pragmatic and complex intervention research framework. Nurse focus group discussions were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Paired measures of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and compassion fatigue before and after one-year implementation were compared.
resultsScores after implementation indicated a decline in compassion satisfaction and an increase in burnout, compared to the baseline. Two superordinate themes were identified from seven focus groups, with twenty-six nurse participants: (i) de-escalation is a relational, adaptive, and collective nursing practice, and (ii) ecological pressures shape the practice of de-escalation. These superordinate themes were developed from seven subordinate themes. DISCUSSION: A cautious interpretation of the quantitative measures is warranted, given the challenges of obtaining follow-up responses in busy, under-resourced inpatient units. The thematic findings suggest that successful implementation depends on the organisational and relational contexts in which interventions are deployed. RECOMMENDATIONS: Future evaluations of the Safe Steps need to consider extending beyond nurses' relational capabilities to encompass the relational responsiveness of multidisciplinary teams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.