Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41546441›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of sports medicine2026

Using a Residual Pivot Shift as the Indication to Perform a Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis During ACL Reconstruction Using Autologous Hamstring Grafts Is Associated With Improved Surgical Outcomes: A Retrospective Review of 4755 Cases.

Mark Porter, Bruce Shadbolt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark PorterCanberra Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Canberra, ACT, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-794X
Bruce ShadboltWestern Sydney University, School of Medicine, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no consensus regarding the appropriate indications for the addition of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) to anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE: To determine if incomplete correction of the pivot shift during ACLR is an appropriate intraoperative indication to add the LET, in terms of clinical outcome. STUDY

designCohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

methodsFrom January 2018, incomplete correction of the pivot shift relative to the contralateral knee was used as the indication to add LET to ACLR. Patients presenting before this date comprised group A and those after group B. Study criteria included first-ever ACL rupture, participating in pivoting sports, no other significant ligament injury, and surgery within 3 months of injury. Outcomes of interest were recurrent instability, meniscal tears, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): Tegner activity score (TAS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales for sport and recreation (sport/rec) and knee-related quality of life, subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Lysholm knee score. Statistical analysis was performed.

resultsGroup A (2258 patients; 51% male) and group B (2497 patients; 58% male) were similar regarding age, body mass index, knee dominance, time to surgery, graft diameter, and preinjury TAS (

conclusionUsing incomplete correction of the pivot shift during ACL surgery as the primary indication to perform LET is associated with lower rates of recurrent ACL rupture, and ipsilateral meniscal tears. Pivot-shift grade before surgery was not associated with risk of recurrence, while residual pivot shift after surgery was.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionHamstring TendonsTenodesisAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityMalePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultACLindicationsreconstructionrecurrencetenodesis

Identifiers

PMID41546441
PMCPMC12861547

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.