ArticleJournal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
Brain Microstructural Damage as Potential Biomarker of Immune Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.
Article in Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Brain Microstructural Damage as Potential Biomarker of Immune Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeChimeric antigen receptor-engineered T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in hematological malignancies may be associated with severe complications, as Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) and Immune effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome (ICANS). The aim of the study is to investigate MRI-derived macrostructural and microstructural features potentially able to identify patients at higher ICANS risk.
methodsForty-two patients treated with CAR-T from October 2020 to June 2025 performed brain MRIs before CAR-T administration, including diffusion-weighted imaging. A general linear model was used to compare patients who developed ICANS, CRS, or neither at baseline in terms of MRI macro- and microstructural features. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the role of microstructural features in predicting the risk of developing ICANS.
resultsMean age 59.2 ± 13 years, 59.5% male; 21 (50%) patients received tisagenlecleucel, 21 (50%), axicabtagene ciloleucel or brexucabtagene autoleucel; 14 (33%) and 31 (73.8%) patients developed ICANS and CRS, respectively. At baseline MRI, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) white matter (WM) hyperintensities were detected in 41/42 (97.6%). No significant differences between patients who developed ICANS, CRS and neither both were observed in terms of FLAIR hyperintensities nor total brain volume at baseline. Fractional anisotropy extracted from FLAIR hyperintensities and WM areas without macroscopic abnormalities was a predictor of ICANS in the logistic regression model (p = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively).
conclusionsFLAIR hyperintensities and brain volume prior to CAR-T were not informative, whereas the severity of WM microstructural (axonal) damage predicted ICANS risk. Greater axonal damage was associated with a higher likelihood of ICANS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.