ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2026
Programmable Nanoscale Motion via Molecular Patterning on DNA Origami.
Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DNA-Enzyme Hybrid Nanostructures: Functional Materials to Modulate Enzymatic Activity.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Programmable Nanoscale Motion via Molecular Patterning on DNA Origami.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Asymmetry in enzymatically driven nanomotor design, both structural and functional, is widely considered essential for propulsion. However, the interplay between particle geometry, enzyme distribution, and catalytic loading remains poorly defined, largely due to limited control over enzyme positioning that hinders quantitative analysis. Using DNA origami nanorods, we achieve precise spatial placement of urease enzymes with independently tunable coverage and asymmetry. Single-particle tracking reveals that motility arises not solely from enzyme number or spatial arrangement but from a balance between catalytic loading and geometric anisotropy. Unexpectedly, maximal propulsion occurs at ∼25% urease end-coverage, significantly below the conventional 50% end-coverage, where half of the available binding positions on one structural half of the origami are occupied. Boundary Element Method simulations incorporating identical spatial parameters reproduce these findings, confirming that programmable enzyme patterning dictates diffusiophoretic propulsion. These results provide a quantitative framework linking topology, catalytic activity, and motion, revealing that optimal motility does not coincide with maximal asymmetry and advancing the rational design of enzyme-powered DNA nanomotors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.