Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41546160›Full record

ArticleAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2026

Programmable Nanoscale Motion via Molecular Patterning on DNA Origami.

Lars Paffen, Maurik Engelbert van Bevervoorde, Andoni Rodriguez-Abetxuko, Loai Abdelmohsen, Remco van der Hofstad, Jan C M van Hest, Tania Patiño Padial

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Programmable Nanoscale Motion via Molecular Patterning on DNA Origami.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lars PaffenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Helix, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Maurik Engelbert van BevervoordeDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Metaforum, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Andoni Rodriguez-AbetxukoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Helix, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Loai AbdelmohsenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Helix, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Remco van der HofstadDepartment of Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Metaforum, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Jan C M van HestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Helix, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.
Tania Patiño PadialDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Helix, P. O. Box 513, Eindhoven, 5600 MB, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9979-7926

Funding

Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research NETWORKS-024.002.003Research Council (NWO)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Asymmetry in enzymatically driven nanomotor design, both structural and functional, is widely considered essential for propulsion. However, the interplay between particle geometry, enzyme distribution, and catalytic loading remains poorly defined, largely due to limited control over enzyme positioning that hinders quantitative analysis. Using DNA origami nanorods, we achieve precise spatial placement of urease enzymes with independently tunable coverage and asymmetry. Single-particle tracking reveals that motility arises not solely from enzyme number or spatial arrangement but from a balance between catalytic loading and geometric anisotropy. Unexpectedly, maximal propulsion occurs at ∼25% urease end-coverage, significantly below the conventional 50% end-coverage, where half of the available binding positions on one structural half of the origami are occupied. Boundary Element Method simulations incorporating identical spatial parameters reproduce these findings, confirming that programmable enzyme patterning dictates diffusiophoretic propulsion. These results provide a quantitative framework linking topology, catalytic activity, and motion, revealing that optimal motility does not coincide with maximal asymmetry and advancing the rational design of enzyme-powered DNA nanomotors.

Indexed as

DNADNA NanostructuresNanotechnologyUreaseMotionDNAUreaseDNA origamiEnzyme kineticsNanomotorsSingle‐particle tracking

Identifiers

PMID41546160
PMCPMC12910145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.