Trial reportJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2026
Efficacy of an intervention to reduce stigma towards people with skin diseases among health and body care professionals - a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesPeople with skin disease often experience stigmatization in health and body care settings, significantly impacting their quality of life. This parallel-group randomized controlled trial evaluated a face-to-face group seminar aimed at reducing stigma towards people with skin disease among health and body care professionals (HBCPs). PATIENTS AND
methodsCosmetologists, hairdressers, nurses, and physical therapists were randomized into an intervention (IG; n = 64) or control group (CG; n = 65). The IG received a seminar consisting of self-awareness exercises, education and a patient encounter; the CG followed a seminar on "health at work". Stereotype agreement, disease-related misconceptions, desire for social distance, and behavioral intentions were assessed at baseline (t0), post-intervention (t1), and 3 months follow-up (t2).
resultsThe intervention group showed significant reductions over time in disease-related misconceptions (t0-t1: 0.398, p < 0.001; t0-t2: 0.225, p < 0.001; ηp
conclusionsThe seminar improved skin disease-related stigmatizing beliefs and attitudes of HBCPs. Its integration into vocational training curricula or delivery in workshops to increase knowledge about skin diseases and to reduce prejudices in various professional groups is promising.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.