ArticleTrials2026
Active subperiosteal vs. passive subdural 24-h drainage following single burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma: statistical analysis plan for the multicenter, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial SUPERDURA.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06621407 (Active 24 Hours Subperiostal vs. 24 Hours Passive Subdural Drainage Following Burr Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Active 24 Hours Subperiostal vs. 24 Hours Passive Subdural Drainage Following Burr Hole Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (the SUPERDURA Trial) - Protocol for a Nationwide Randomized Clinical Non-inferiority Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Denmark, the current treatment of patients with symptomatic chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is single burr hole hematoma evacuation followed by 24-h passive subdural drainage. However, recent studies indicate that 24-h active subperiosteal drainage may be safer and have fewer recurrences. The upcoming SUPERDURA trial will investigate 24-h active subperiosteal drainage versus 24-h passive subdural drainage following single burr-hole evacuation of symptomatic CSDH. This study presents the statistical analysis plan for the SUPERDURA trial.
methodsSUPERDURA is a national multi-center non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. The primary outcome is a composite of 90-day mortality and ipsilateral recurrent CSDH requiring reoperation within the 90-day observation period. Secondary outcomes are 90-day simplified modified Rankin Scale questionnaire (smRSq) score, complications related to surgery, postoperative serious adverse events during the admission and at 90 days, and length of hospitalization. Exploratory outcomes are smRSq score as an ordinal outcome, each component of the primary outcome, and discharge destination. A total of 354 participants must be included (177 in each intervention group) in the study to achieve a stable power > 90% with an alpha of 5% for non-inferiority testing of the primary composite outcome with a margin at 7% absolute risk increase. The allocation sequence and block sizes are blinded to the investigators. Interim analyses for safety and efficacy/futility will be performed after follow-up is completed for 120 and 240 participants, respectively. A Data Safety Monitoring Committee charter has been created following published recommendations. Final analysis will be done by two statisticians blinded to the intervention, creating two abstracts that are unblinded once approved by the study steering committee. DISCUSSION: The proposed analysis plan is designed in accordance with current guidelines, has clinically important primary and secondary outcomes, and was submitted before the inclusion of the first participant in the SUPERDURA trial to limit bias and increase study transparency and reproducibility.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT06621407.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.