ArticleBMC palliative care2026
Palliative care interventions and outcome in patients with glioblastoma - a retrospective, single-center study.
Article in BMC palliative care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with glioblastoma (GB) not only suffer from a life-threatening oncological disease but also present with severe neurological symptoms and high psychosocial distress. The unfavorable prognosis and the early decline in neurological functions and activities of daily living, such as mobility, lead to a significant deterioration in quality of life aspects. The need for palliative care (PC) therefore arises at an early stage and increases as the disease progresses but is often inadequately assessed and treated.
methodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, we investigated prognostic factors, survival outcomes and neuro-oncologically focused primary palliative care (nPPC) as well as specialized palliative care (SPC) interventions. Pearson's Chi-square test and an univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis were used to test the independence between categorical variables and the correlation between SPC and tumor-specific therapy prior to death. The Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox regression analysis were performed to estimate the impact of SPC on survival.
resultsA cohort of 274 patients with GB was investigated, of whom 251 (91.6%) received nPPC and 210 (76.6%) SPC. Patients with SPC (p < 0.001; OR: 0.302; 95% CI: 0.157-0.584) and patients with methylation of the MGMT promoter region (p = 0.005; OR: 0.375; 95% CI: 0.190-0.739) were less likely to receive a tumor-specific therapy in the 30 days prior to death. Median overall survival was 16.9 months (95% CI: 14.5-19.3 months) for patients with SPC (n = 210) vs. 12.9 months (95% CI: 10.8-15.1 months) for patients without (n = 64) (p = 0.100; not significant). The Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that SPC significantly correlates with longer overall survival (p = 0.017; HR: 0.707; 95% CI: 0.532-0.939).
conclusionThis study revealed a broad availability of PC interventions for patients with GB. After adjustment of known prognostic factors, an association between SPC supply and prolonged OS was observed. Utmost efforts should be made to incorporate PC into the care of every patient within a standardized framework. Data on PC in patients with GB is still rare; therefore, further research should be made to improve PC in this highly burdened patient group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.