Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41546071›Full record

Trial reportBMC health services research2026

Young adults' access to mental health care: integrating the Primary Care Behavioral Health model into routine care in Sweden.

Per Nilsen, Lise Bergman Nordgren, Kristin Thomas, Erica Skagius Ruiz, Hanna Israelsson Larsen

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Per NilsenDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. per.nilsen@liu.se.
Lise Bergman NordgrenDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.
Kristin ThomasDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Division of Society and Health, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Erica Skagius RuizDivision of Prevention, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Hanna Israelsson LarsenDivision of Prevention, Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Rehabilitation and Community Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMental health issues among young adults are increasing. Swedish data indicate a three- to fourfold increase in symptoms of anxiety and distress over the past two decades. Access to mental health services in primary care is often hindered by long wait times and resource limitations. The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) model, characterized by brief, team-based interventions delivered by behavioural health consultants (BHCs), offers a promising approach to improve access. However, limited evidence exists on its impact on young adult populations.

methodsA pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster trial was used to evaluate the impact of facilitating PCBH integration on young adults aged 18-24 years in nine primary care centres in Region Östergötland, Sweden. Data were collected from medical records spanning three phases: pre-facilitation (year 1), facilitation (year 3) and post-facilitation (year 4). Year 2 measurements were excluded to avoid contamination because primary care centres were receiving information about the PCBH model during that period. This ensured that pre-facilitation data reflected conventional primary care conditions. Four outcomes were investigated: (1) number of unique patients, (2) number of BHC appointments by all patients, (3) average waiting times for all appointments, and (4) average waiting times for first appointments. The study was partially carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic. While the pre-facilitation phase occurred before the pandemic, the facilitation phase partially overlapped with it and the post-facilitation phase took place entirely during the pandemic.

resultsThe number of unique young adult patients accessing BHC services increased by 84% during facilitation (p < 0.001) and remained 25% above baseline post-facilitation. Total BHC appointments increased by 16% during facilitation (p < 0.001) and 13% post-facilitation (p = 0.006). The steepest increase was in remote consultations. Average waiting times for all appointments decreased from 14.1 to 11.8 days during facilitation (p < 0.001), and reductions were sustained post-facilitation (13.4 days, p = 0.007). In-person first appointment waiting times also decreased significantly during and after facilitation (both 7.1 days versus 8.8 days at baseline; p < 0.001).

conclusionsIntegrating the PCBH model into routine primary care improved access to mental health services for young adults, as demonstrated by increased utilization and reduced waiting times. The findings highlight the model's potential for scalable, team-based mental health delivery in primary care. However, decreases post-facilitation suggest that sustained implementation support may be important for long-term impact. It is important to note that the lack of a comparison group precludes definitive conclusions regarding the effects of the model, as alternative explanations for the observed changes cannot be ruled out.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdolescentCOVID-19FemaleHumansSwedenYoung AdultAccessInterrupted time seriesMental healthPrimary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH)Young adults

Identifiers

PMID41546071
PMCPMC12849097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.