ArticleJournal of cannabis research2026
The differential effects of CBD and CBDA on viability and mRNA expression in colorectal cancer cells.
Article in Journal of cannabis research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCannabinoids have attracted significant attention for their potential therapeutic application in cancer research. However, recent studies have reported antitumor activity of cannabidiolic acid (CBDA)-the acidic precursor of CBD-in breast cancer cells, involving modulation of cyclooxygenase signaling. To our knowledge, no investigations have examined the effects of CBDA on RNA expression and signaling pathways in colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effects of CBD, CBDA, and a CBDA-rich Cannabis sativa (C.s). extract on the growth and gene expression in CRC cell lines.
methodsWe assessed cell viability and clonogenic growth of the CRC cell lines HCT116 and DLD1 following treatment with pure CBD, pure CBDA, a CBDA-rich C.s. extract (CBDA/CBD ratio 20:1), and a corresponding mixture of pure CBDA/CBD. RNA sequencing was performed to analyze differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the cell signaling pathways affected by these treatments.
resultsOf all tested compounds, CBD exhibited the strongest cytotoxic effect in both cell lines, whereas CBDA demonstrated minimal toxicity, particularly in HCT116 cells. Furthermore, we observed a greater inhibitory effect of the CBDA-rich C.s. extract on HCT116 cell growth compared to the CBDA/CBD mixture. RNA sequencing analysis revealed that CBD had the most pronounced impact on gene expression, while CBDA had the least. Notably, treatment with the C.s. extract resulted in a higher number of DEGs than the CBDA/CBD mixture in HCT116. Gene expression analysis indicated an upregulation of the Wnt and Hippo signaling pathways following CBD treatment. Additionally, CBDA, CBD/CBDA (1:20), and the C.s. extract primarily induced metabolic processes in DLD1 cells, suggesting a distinct metabolic response.
conclusionOur findings showed that CBD exerts stronger effects on cell survival and gene expression in CRC cells than CBDA, which showed only limited activity. Moreover, the CBDA-rich C.s. extract exhibited greater efficacy than the CBDA/CBD mixture. More research is needed to further elucidate the impact of cannabinoids on CRC cell biology and signaling pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.