ArticleBMC nursing2026
Nurses' perspectives on the effectiveness of mobile X-ray services in RACFs. a qualitative study.
Article in BMC nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere has been an increase in the use of mobile X-ray imaging services (MXIS) in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). Nurses, as key healthcare professionals, play a dynamic and critical role in a resident’s health, care and well-being journey that includes imaging. This exploratory study examines RACF nurses’ experiences and perspectives on the effectiveness of MXIS, with a focus on its contribution to continuity of care and resident wellbeing.
methodsThis study employed a qualitative exploratory approach. Thirteen nurses were recruited through purposive sampling technique from five RACFs and one hospital site offering MXIS. The data were collected through in-person, semi-structured interviews that were transcribed verbatim. Initial coding was conducted, followed by a thematic analysis to identify key themes and their corresponding subthemes.
resultsThree key themes were identified: (1) before medical imaging assessment, (2) at the point of medical imaging referral decisions, and (3) medical imaging and outcomes. The RACF–MXIS journey spans from the initial imaging request to post-imaging follow-up. Nurses described navigating a complex, hierarchical referral system involving medical professionals while also participating in flexible, shared decision-making with family members and residents. Although MXIS was widely praised for improving access and enhancing resident outcomes, delays were frequently reported due to limited availability of general practitioners, scope-of-practice restrictions, and resource constraints.
conclusionThe implementation of MXIS in RACFs is shaped by complex clinical, ethical, and systemic factors, with nurses playing a central role in coordinating resident imaging pathways. Strengthening nursing authority through targeted MXIS training, collaborative frameworks, and equity-focused competencies can enhance responsiveness and resident-centred care. Policy and practice reforms that empower nursing leadership are essential to achieving timely, compassionate, and integrated diagnostic outcomes in aged care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.