ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
Management of lumbar spinal epidural abscess using biportal endoscopic approach: a case series.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSpinal epidural abscesses, though rare, can have devastating consequences if not detected and treated promptly. Surgical treatment involving laminectomy with thorough irrigation and debridement with or without fusion, is the primary option for high-risk patients who may experience recurrence with nonoperative management. The recently developed biportal endoscopic technique provides several advantages over traditional microscopic techniques, including reduced surgical morbidity and continuous wound irrigation throughout the procedure. However, studies involving the use of biportal endoscopic techniques to treat spinal epidural abscesses are rare. This report presents cases of spinal epidural abscesses treated using the biportal endoscopic approach, along with the clinical results and a detailed description of the procedure.
methodsPatients who underwent biportal endoscopic surgery for spinal epidural abscesses between May 2020 and June 2023 were analyzed. The variables assessed included demographics, laboratory values, microbiological results, perioperative complications, and postoperative outcomes in terms of clinical and laboratory results. The minimum follow-up period was one year.
resultsFifteen patients who underwent biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for the treatment of spinal epidural abscess were included. Intraoperative tissue cultures were positive in eight patients (53%), while three other patients had positive blood or urine cultures, resulting in an overall pathogen identification rate of 73%. All patients showed normalization of the C-reactive protein (CRP) level and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). The visual analog scale (VAS) leg (5.5 ± 1.9 pre-operatively, 1.6 ± 1.1 1 year postoperatively), VAS back (7.1 ± 1.3, 1.7 ± 0.7), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI; 67.7 ± 15.3, 13.7 ± 6.2) demonstrated improvement. Based on clinical and laboratory results, all patients were determined to have well-controlled infections, and none required repeat abscess drainage or spinal fusion.
conclusionsBiportal endoscopic decompressive laminectomy with abscess drainage may be an alternative treatment option for spinal epidural abscesses. While this case series showed improved outcomes after biportal endoscopic treatment for spinal epidural abscesses, further studies, specifically comparing outcomes to those treated with a conventional open approach, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.