ArticleBMC genomics2026
The phylogeny and evolution of blow flies (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from the perspective of mitogenomics.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCalliphoridae (Diptera: Calyptratae), known as blow flies, are widespread insects of great veterinary, ecological, and forensic importance. Among the most familiar insects to humans, however, the classification and taxonomic composition have long been controversial. With nearly twenty proposed subfamilies, the monophyly of calliphorids has never been reached, until the latest phylogenomic study which redefined the Calliphoridae.
resultsWith the mitochondrial genomes of seven Calliphoridae species analyzed for the first time using a comparative mitogenomics approach, this study investigates the phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history within the family. Data from five subfamilies are documented here for the first time. The results strongly support the monophyly of both the Calliphoridae family and its subfamilies, with the subfamily-level relationships largely consistent with those found in previous phylogenomic study. The ancestral larval feeding habit of Calliphoridae is recovered as sarcosarprophagy, and the carrion breeding habit characteristic of typical blow flies (Calliphorinae, Chrysomyinae, and Luciliinae) is shown to have arisen independently twice.
conclusionsThis study provides the mitogenomic phylogeny of calliphorids with the most comprehensive taxon sampling to date, thereby advancing our understanding of the evolutionary history of calyptrates and providing valuable contributions to the fields of veterinary, ecology, forensics, and entomology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.