Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545950›Full record

Observational studyBMC oral health2026

Supportive periodontal therapy: individual patients' perception of various professional interventions.

Miriam Cyris, Leah Kopetzki, Dominik M Schulte, Christoph E Dörfer, Johannes C Ehrenthal, Christian Graetz

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miriam Cyris *Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Leah Kopetzki *Clinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Dominik M SchulteDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph E DörferClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, Kiel, 24105, Germany.
Johannes C EhrenthalDepartment of Psychology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Christian GraetzClinic of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Schleswig- Holstein, Campus Kiel, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus B, Kiel, 24105, Germany. graetz@konspar.uni-kiel.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence on psychophysiological responses such as heart rate (HR) and electrodermal response (EDR) during long-term supportive periodontal therapy (SPT) is limited. This observational cross-sectional pilot study aimed to explore associations between patient-related factors and physiological stress markers during routine SPT visits, focusing on adherence-related variables.

methodsA sample of n = 75 patients was examined in a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey, indicating sufficient adherence to SPT of ≥ 2 years (a maximum deviation ± 6 months between SPT intervals) at a specialized department for periodontology. At the preliminary last SPT visit, in addition to dental parameters, we assessed socio-demographic, treatment-related (critical attitudes/complaints), psychological variables-such as dental fear, oral health-related quality of life, dental anticipatory trauma symptoms, childhood traumata, depression, and personality functioning-and vital parameters such as HR and EDR. The primary endpoint was the difference in HR and EDR across predefined procedural clusters reflecting varying invasiveness (three clusters: non-invasive (n-iC), minimally invasive (m-iC), and invasive (iC). Analyses were performed using non-parametric tests and exploratory correlation analyses.

resultsThe mean (standard deviation) of HR differed significantly across intervention clusters (n-iC/m-iC/iC: 73.06[11.96]/67.66[9.60]/69.46[10.00] bpm; p ≤ 0.001), while EDR revealed no significant differences (n-iC/m-iC/iC: 69.64[156.65]/61.72[172.20]/75.10[154.07] µS; p ≥ 0.075). EDR negatively correlated with the number of teeth m-iC-interventions (r = -0.423; p = 0.003). Moreover, EDR and HR were significantly related to certain variables such as long-term medication and number of general diseases (p < 0.001). Significant correlations included a positive association between Oral Health Impact Profile scores and dental anxiety (r = 0.233; p = 0.040) and a negative correlation with the total number of teeth (r = -0.378; p < 0.001).

conclusionSocio-demographic and treatment-related factors were intertwined with patient and dental parameters in SPT and appeared to influence adherence. HR varied across clusters, but no clear link between vital signs and psychological stress could be established.

trial registrationThe clinical trial was prospectively registered in the DRKS-German Clinical Trials Register ( https://www.drks.de ) with the registration-ID DRKS00031969 (06/05/2023).

Indexed as

Periodontal DiseasesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDental AnxietyFemaleGalvanic Skin ResponseHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePilot ProjectsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesComplianceDental fearHeart ratePeriodontitisSupportive periodontal therapyTooth loss

Identifiers

PMID41545950
PMCPMC12870894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.