Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545894›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2026

Mechanical power of ventilation: tracking the damaging component.

John J Marini, Philip S Crooke, Patricia R M Rocco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John J MariniDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/St Paul, MN, USA. marin002@umn.edu.
Philip S CrookeDepartment of Mathematics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Patricia R M RoccoLaboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Carlos Chagas Filho Institute of Biophysics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mechanical power has emerged as a unifying metric to quantify the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), integrating multiple ventilatory parameters-such as tidal volume, airway pressures, respiratory rate, and inspiratory airflow-into a single measure of the mechanical energy delivered to the lungs. However, total mechanical power alone cannot fully predict the likelihood of injury, as the development of VILI depends not only on delivered energy but also on how this energy interacts with the lung's regional mechanical properties and its intrinsic vulnerability to stress. Critically, only externally measured inflation energy that exceeds one or more local alveolar stress thresholds-termed hazardous elastic power-is likely to contribute to lung damage. In this context, we propose a conceptual method to quantify this damaging component of mechanical power in relation to regional stress thresholds for injury. Once refined and validated, incorporating this approach into clinical practice could enhance individualized, lung-protective ventilation strategies by recognizing that VILI arises from the convergence of mechanical energy, regional stress, and structural vulnerability.

Indexed as

Respiration, ArtificialVentilator-Induced Lung InjuryHumansRespiratory Distress SyndromeTidal VolumeARDSEnergyHazardMechanical ventilationPowerVILI

Identifiers

PMID41545894
PMCPMC12809898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.