ArticleBMC health services research2026
Employees in the municipal healthcare service experiences with participation in quality improvement collaboratives and the use of the Quality Improvement Model: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundQuality improvement is a continuous process, and quality improvement collaboratives are frequently used worldwide to promote quality improvement. A Quality Improvement Model is recommended for performing quality improvement work systematically to ensure both quality and patient safety in healthcare services. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of municipal healthcare service employees’ use of the enhanced first phase of the Quality Improvement Model and to explore their experiences of participation in digital quality improvement collaboratives.
methodsA qualitative design with focus group interviews was used. A semistructured interview guide was developed by the authors prior to the focus group interviews with the goal of obtaining relevant data for this study. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyse the focus group interviews.
resultsThree themes were revealed by the analysis: learning in community with others in a digital quality improvement collaborative; it is important to use the Quality Improvement Model properly; and the establishment of a culture that is conducive to quality improvement work is important. These themes highlight the necessity of ensuring that both managers and employees are familiar with the Quality Improvement Model used in quality improvement projects and understanding the importance of dedicating sufficient time to the preparation phase. Digital quality improvement collaboratives sessions and interim process guidance were key to sustaining momentum and driving progress in the quality improvement work.
conclusionThe Quality Improvement Model is suitable for quality improvement work; furthermore, by using the model, participants were able to remain in the preparation phase longer, thereby refining their quality improvement work and making the project more robust. The digital quality improvement collaborative sessions and the process guidance provided between the sessions were important with respect to the progress of quality improvement work. Leadership anchoring and involvement are essential with respect to efforts to encourage employees to participate in quality improvement work and implement the changes required by such work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.