ArticleBMC surgery2026
Manual reduction in minimally invasive management of obturator hernia: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncarcerated obturator hernias, rare but serious, often require emergency surgery in elderly patients having poor health. In recent years, several studies have reported that manual reduction under imaging guidance may facilitate less invasive, elective laparoscopic repair. However, the clinical significance of successful manual reduction in terms of surgical strategy and postoperative outcomes remains unclear.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 35 incarcerated obturator hernia cases treated at our institution between 2016 and 2025. Ultrasound-guided manual reduction was attempted in all cases. The success of reduction was confirmed using post-reduction computed tomography (CT) imaging. Patients were then classified into two groups: the reduction success group (n = 14) and the failure group (n = 21). We compared the patients’ backgrounds, surgical approaches, bowel resections, mesh usage, and postoperative outcomes between the groups.
resultsLaparoscopic repair was more frequent in success group (43% vs. 5%, P = 0.04). Bowel resection was not required for success group patients but was necessitated in 53% of failure group patients (P = 0.02). Mesh usage was higher in success group (100% vs. 29%, P = 0.001). No manual reduction-related complications were noted. Severe postoperative complications (Clavien–Dindo ≥ grade III) were more frequent in failure group (29% vs. 0%).
conclusionsUltrasound-guided manual reduction appeared safe in our cohort and was associated with a higher feasibility of elective surgery and laparoscopic mesh repair, with lower rates of bowel resection and severe postoperative complications. Reduction success may serve as a practical marker to guide surgical planning, although causal inference is limited by the retrospective design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.