Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545848›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2026

Swin Transformer-based intelligent fracture classification and radiographic assessment to support clinical decision-making.

Yuming Xu, Weiao Ying, Yi Du, Qing Wang, Juan Zheng, Zhouliang Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yuming XuHand surgery Department, Yongkang First People's Hospital, Yongkang, 321300, China.
Weiao YingEmergency Department, Yongkang First People's Hospital, Yongkang, 321300, China.
Yi DuOrthopedics Department, Yongkang First People's Hospital, Yongkang, 321300, China.
Qing WangOrthopedics Department, Yongkang First People's Hospital, Yongkang, 321300, China.
Juan ZhengPathology Department, Yongkang First People's Hospital, No. 599, Jinshan West Road, Dongcheng Street, Yongkang, Zhejiang, 321300, China.
Zhouliang YangPathology Department, Yongkang First People's Hospital, No. 599, Jinshan West Road, Dongcheng Street, Yongkang, Zhejiang, 321300, China. yzlywa@163.com.

Funding

Jinhua City Science and Technology Project No.2023-4-284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate assessment of fracture healing is essential for optimizing clinical decision-making in orthopedics, yet traditional radiographic evaluation often suffers from subjectivity and limited predictive value. The present study assesses the applicability of deep learning models for automated fracture-type classification on X-ray images and explores their potential contribution to imaging-based evaluation of fracture healing. The goal was to develop an efficient and accurate classification framework capable of supporting clinical diagnosis.

methodsA total of 1,175 X-ray images covering various fracture types (transverse, oblique, spiral) and anatomical locations (humerus, radius, femur, tibia, phalanges) were obtained from public datasets (FracAtlas and Roboflow Universe). Images were preprocessed to a uniform resolution of 256 × 256 pixels. Three models, Residual Network (ResNet), Vision Transformer (ViT), and Swin-Transformer, were trained using an 8:1:1 training-validation-test split. Model performance was evaluated through accuracy, parameter size, computational complexity measured by FLOPs, and convergence characteristics. Gradient-Weighted Class Activation Mapping (Grad-CAM) was used to visualize decision regions. Conditional GAN–based augmentation was applied to improve minority-class representation, and its effects were analyzed using both an independent test set and a stratified five-fold paired evaluation.

resultsThe Swin Transformer achieved the best performance in automated fracture classification, with a test accuracy of 91.27%, a parameter size of 29 MB, and a computational complexity of 4.5 GFLOPs. Compared with the other models, it demonstrated faster convergence and lower loss values. ResNet and ViT achieved accuracies of 87.53% and 89.74%, respectively, with relatively higher complexity and computational costs. Grad-CAM visualization further showed that the Swin Transformer effectively captured both global and local imaging features, thereby improving fracture identification accuracy. When evaluating the impact of GAN-based data augmentation, the overall accuracy on an independent 10% test set increased from 89.24% to 91.52%, although the McNemar paired test did not reach statistical significance (p > 0.05). Under a stratified five-fold cross-validation setting, paired t-tests revealed statistically significant improvements in macro-averaged recall, F1 score, and AUC (all p < 0.05), with corresponding 95% confidence intervals and effect sizes (Cohen’s dz).

conclusionsDeep learning models, particularly the Swin Transformer, show strong potential for automated fracture-type classification and imaging-based evaluation using single time-point X-ray images, offering meaningful auxiliary support for clinical diagnosis and fracture-healing assessment. The findings reflect performance in fracture-type recognition rather than dynamic prediction of healing progression, as only cross-sectional X-ray images were analyzed. Future research incorporating longitudinal imaging and multi-center clinical cohorts will be essential for evaluating model performance in true fracture-healing prediction scenarios.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingDeep LearningFracture HealingFractures, BoneRadiographyHumansDeep learningFracture healingGradient-Weighted Class Activation MappingImage classificationResidual neural networkSwin-Transformer

Identifiers

PMID41545848
PMCPMC12892772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.