ArticleBMC geriatrics2026
Subjective model of successful aging and its determinants-analysis of a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDue to the ongoing aging process in many societies, Successful Aging-SA is of paramount importance both individually and socially. The objective criteria for SA, as formulated by Rowe and Kahn, are the subject of critical debate. One criticism is the lack of a subjective assessment of SA by individuals. The aim was to examine SA and its determinants from the perspective of older adults.
methodsThe study included 2,964 individuals aged 60-103 years (mean 70.44;SD = 7.09) - 1,974 women (66.60%) and 990 men (33.40%). The study area was southern Poland. The research tool was a questionnaire consisting of a metric section and a proprietary tool - the Successful Aging Index-SAI. Additionally, the study utilized questionnaires assessing health-related quality of life - the SF-12, physical activity - the PAQE, and anxiety and depression - the HADS.
resultsSAI was higher in women than in men. There was no correlation between age and the domains or the overall SAI. Sociodemographic variables: education, size of residence, marital status, household management, presence of chronic disease, and having children differentiated SAI and its domains: p < 0.0001. Regression results showed that physical and mental health components, education level, and household size positively influenced SAI levels.
conclusionsA sense of physical and mental health has a key impact on SA. Important moderators of SA include individual agency, sociodemographic factors, and, in particular, education level and household type. Due to the difficulties in defining unambiguous quality criteria, SA should be treated as a linear variable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.