ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026
Assessing multiple techniques for identifying various sources of chloride to urban groundwater and streams.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chloride (Cl) concentrations in urban surface waters and groundwaters in temperate climate regions have been rising, with this primarily attributed to the application of road salt. While this may be the case in many locations, other anthropogenic sources of Cl, such as wastewater, landfill leachate, softened water, and fertilizers, may play an important role but are often overlooked. Natural Cl sources must not be overlooked either. Proper identification of the chloride source is necessary to guide potential mitigation measures. This study demonstrates and assesses a unique suite of five techniques that have been used to characterize Cl sources affecting freshwater systems, including established and more novel methods-temporal Cl concentration patterns (including continuous specific conductance and water pressure monitoring), Cl/Na ratios, Cl/Br ratios, water isotopes, and artificial sweeteners. These were applied to an urban site with a variety of groundwater and river/stream end members, with additional groundwater-surface water interactions between them. Together, these five techniques identified influences at the site of several chloride sources, including road salt, wastewater, landfill leachate, and natural deeper groundwater. Moreover, spatial and temporal patterns in their influence were revealed. No one method was successful at clearly identifying the salt sources impacting a given water or location, especially across the entire year. The methods were further assessed on the benefits and limitations of the assessment they provide, including relative cost, to aid fellow practitioners in selection of source characterization methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.