Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545795›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical systems2026

Reducing Work-Related Screen-Time in Healthcare Workers During Leisure Time (REDUCE SCREEN) - A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Karsten Bartels, Karan Shah, Emelind Sanchez Rodriguez, Julie T Hoffman, Megan L Rolfzen, Juana Mora Valdovinos, Afton L Hassett, Daniel I Sessler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05106647 (Reducing Work-related Screen Time in Health Care Workers During Leisure Time), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05106647 nacompletednot on this map

Reducing Work-related Screen Time in Health Care Workers During Leisure Time

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of NebraskaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled520ConditionsStress, Burnout, CaregiverArmsReduce screen time
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Karsten BartelsDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. kbartels@med.umich.edu.
Karan ShahDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Emelind Sanchez RodriguezDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Julie T HoffmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Megan L RolfzenDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Juana Mora ValdovinosDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Afton L HassettDepartment of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Daniel I SesslerCenter for Outcomes Research and Department of Anesthesiology, UTHealth Science Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ubiquitous availability of work-related applications on personal devices makes healthcare workers prone to working during leisure time. We tested the hypothesis that an intervention to reduce work-related screen time during a weekend off reduces stress in healthcare workers. Pragmatic parallel design randomized controlled trial between November 2021 and November 2023. Healthcare workers using a smartphone with a work email application were eligible. Randomization was 1:1 to no treatment or a threefold educational intervention to: 1) activate automated responses to emails received, 2) reduce screen time, and 3) uninstall work applications from personal devices. The primary outcome was the change in participants' stress from pre- to post-weekend, measured with the Perceived Stress Scale-10. The secondary outcome was device screen time. Among 815 enrolled participants, 520 responded to the post-intervention survey. The median [Q1, Q3] change from baseline Perceived Stress Scale-10 scores was -2 [-7, 0] in controls and -4 [-9, 0] in the intervention group. The mean difference (intervention - control) in post-intervention Perceived Stress Scale-10 scores, adjusted for baseline stress, was -1.6 (95% CI: -2.6, -0.6; P = 0.002). The median [Q1, Q3] change from baseline screen time was 0 [-2, 1] hours in the controls and -1 [-3, 0] hours in the intervention group. A three-pronged educational intervention targeting work-related screen time among healthcare workers doubled stress reduction during a non-work weekend. Stress reduction in the intervention group was mediated by reduced screen time. Future research should investigate long-term effects and broader implementation of such interventions to promote well-being in the healthcare workforce. Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05106647 . Identifier: NCT05106647, Registration date: November 4, 2021.

Indexed as

Health PersonnelLeisure ActivitiesOccupational StressScreen TimeAdultElectronic MailFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmartphoneBurnoutPerceived stress scaleSmartphoneStressTechnology

Identifiers

PMID41545795
PMCPMC12811315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.