ArticleNpj mental health research2026
Beyond depression symptoms: the default mode network as a predictor of antidepressant response.
Article in Npj mental health research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Research on Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted rTMS Based on Neuroimaging Navigation for the Treatment of Depressive Patients With Suicidal Ideation
A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of Precise Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Therapy Based on Neuroimaging in Depressed Adolescents With Anhedonia.
Research on the Efficacy and Brain Network Mechanism of Personalized Targeting Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) Based on Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antidepressant efficacy for major depressive disorder (MDD) remains limited, with the neural mechanisms underlying treatment response poorly understood. The default mode network (DMN), particularly the connectivity between the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), has been implicated in MDD pathophysiology and may be linked to treatment outcomes. However, its potential as a biomarker for antidepressant response has not been validated. Here, we investigate the relationship between DMN connectivity and antidepressant treatment response in MDD. Resting-state fMRI data from four large MDD cohorts (n = 4271) were analyzed using Granger causality to examine directional effective connectivity (EC) within the DMN. Linear mixed-effects models compared EC between recurrent MDD patients, first-episode drug-naïve patients, and healthy controls. We also examined associations between EC, medication use, illness duration, depressive symptoms, and treatment outcomes. Additionally, Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers and support vector regression (SVR) were trained using EC from mPFC to PCC to predict treatment response. Our results revealed that recurrent MDD patients exhibited significantly reduced EC from mPFC to PCC compared to healthy controls and first-episode patients, with this reduction correlating with antidepressant medication use and illness duration. Importantly, DMN connectivity was associated with treatment improvement rather than core depressive symptoms, including suicide, anhedonia, or emotional blunting. Crucially, EC from mPFC to PCC predicted antidepressant treatment response, and SVM classifiers demonstrated high predictive accuracy for therapeutic outcomes. In conclusion, reduced EC from mPFC to PCC may serve as a biomarker for antidepressant treatment response in MDD, offering insights into MDD neurobiology and supporting the clinical potential of DMN connectivity measures for guiding treatment decisions. The SAINT, Xijing_QG, and Xijing_KG datasets were approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University (approval numbers: KY20202066-F-1, XJLL-KY20222111, and KY20222165-F-1, respectively) and registered with clinicaltrials.gov (identifiers: NCT04653337, NCT05577481, and NCT05544071, respectively).
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.