ArticleScientific reports2026
Teacher activities and student participation in university classrooms: a cross-sectional study in the technological era.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The relationship between smartphone usage and sleep quality among university students: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated how interactive teaching, constructive feedback, technology use, and teacher-student relationships influence student participation in Bangladeshi universities. Using a quantitative, cross-sectional design, data were collected from 417 students across public and private universities through structured questionnaires. Analyses using descriptive statistics, Spearman’s correlation, ANOVA, and regression models tested ten hypotheses. Results showed significant positive associations between interactive teaching and participation (ρ = 0.386, p < .001), and between teacher feedback and motivation (ρ = 0.415, p < .001). Technology use was positively associated with both interactive teaching and student participation, indicating a mediating relationship. The findings suggest that technology use is more strongly associated with participation when combined with interactive pedagogy and emotional support. However, not all hypotheses were supported; particularly the moderation effect of technology use (H₅), and demographic differences by gender and academic discipline (H₈, H₉), which were not statistically significant. Despite limitations such as self-reported data and a single-country focus, the study contributes to understanding how pedagogy, technology, and relational factors jointly foster engagement. It offers practical insights for educators and policymakers to design more interactive, inclusive, and motivating learning environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.