ArticleScientific reports2026
Introduction of the Ex/AxI ratio for optimized assessment of exophthalmos based on bulbar position parameters examined in a population-based MRI study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exophthalmometry is an essential component in the determination of changes in the position of the eyeball and is influenced by various factors. This paper analyzes the usefulness of the Ex/Axl ratio, meaning the ratio of anterior exophthalmos to bulbar axial length, in relation to the position of the eye in the orbit in order to take better account the anthropometric characteristics of individual exophthalmometry measurements. MRI scans of the head in the population-based cohorts SHIP-START-2 and SHIP-TREND-0 were used to perform anterior and posterior exophthalmometry as well as bulbar axial length measurements in 2083 subjects between 21 and 89 years of age. After excluding non-measurable images, 1926 subjects were included in the data analysis. We established sex- and age specific reference limits for the Ex/Axl ratio and the exophthalmometry parameters. If the Ex/Axl ratio was above 85.3% in men and above 79.7% in women, this indicated pathological exophthalmos in our study. Exophthalmometry should be considered on a sex-specific basis since there are clear differences in the measurements between men and women. MRI images of the head were used to determine separate reference values for men and women, which may be useful in clinical practice. Furthermore, our study highlights the clinical significance of measuring the individual bulbar axial length and anthropometric data for the personalized assessment of exophthalmos. In this context, the newly introduced Ex/Axl ratio may be a useful tool for a better differentiation between pseudoexophthalmos and clinically relevant exophthalmos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.