Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545560›Full record

Observational studyNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026

Sex-related differences in the short and long-term outcome of internal pallidus stimulation for dystonia.

Luigi M Romito, Roberta Telese, Ahmet Kaymak, Fabiana Colucci, Antonio E Elia, Sara Rinaldo, Grazia Devigili, Roberto Cilia, Giovanna Zorzi, Alberto Mazzoni and 7 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Luigi M RomitoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy. luigi.romito@istituto-besta.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6772-1035
Roberta TeleseDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Ahmet KaymakComputational Neuroengineering Laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Fabiana ColucciDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Antonio E EliaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Sara RinaldoDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Grazia DevigiliDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Roberto CiliaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Giovanna ZorziDepartment of Pediatric Neuroscience, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Alberto MazzoniComputational Neuroengineering Laboratory, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna di Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Valentina LetaDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Michael ZechInstitute of Neurogenomics, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Neuherberg, Germany.
Miryam CarecchioDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Barbara GaravagliaUnit of Medical Genetics and Neurogenetics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Vincenzo LeviFunctional Neurosurgery Unit Neurosurgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy.
Nico Golfrè AndreasiDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.
Roberto EleopraDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Movement Disorders Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, via Giovanni Celoria 11, Milan, 20128, Italy.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG 458949627; ZE 1213/2-1)EJP Rare Disease EJP RD Joint Transnational Call 2022Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)Free State of Bavaria Excellence Strategy of the Federal Government and the LänderGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research BMBFMinistero della Salute GR-2009-1594645PreDYT project (PREdictive biomarkers in DYsTonia) 01GM2302Technical University of Munich Institute for Advanced Study Technical University of Munich Institute for Advanced Study
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe importance of sex as a determinant of Globus pallidus internus deep brain stimulation (GPi-DBS) outcome in adults with dystonia remains uncertain. We investigated whether sex is a determinant of the efficacy and safety of GPi-DBS in dystonia.

methodsIn this double-center, retrospective cohort study, we followed patients with idiopathic, inherited, or secondary dystonia for at least 12 months after surgery. Dystonia was assessed using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS). Adverse events were recorded.

resultsFifty-six consecutive patients (22 M/34F) were studied. GPi-DBS led to comparable improvements in both sexes. Male patients showed a motor improvement of 62.6 ± 42.4% at 1 year and 53.9 ± 20.9% at the last follow-up (8.6 ± 3.3 years), while female patients showed a motor improvement of 60.5%±29.0% at 1 year and 48.6 ± 28.3% at the last follow-up (at 7.1 ± 4.2 years). Improvement in disability and adverse events were comparable between the two groups. At the first reglage, females showed lower electrical energy delivery, which increased significantly during follow-up. The position of the optimal stimulation center did not differ significantly between the two groups.

conclusionOur study suggests that the overall motor outcomes and safety profiles were similar across sexes, indicating that factors such as age at implant, precision of lead positioning, and severity of dystonia may be more critical determinants of efficacy than sex itself.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDystoniaGlobus PallidusSex FactorsAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeBurke-Fahn-Marsden dystonia rating scaleDBSDeep brain stimulationDystoniaFemaleGlobus pallidum internusGPiMaleSex

Identifiers

PMID41545560
PMCPMC12811284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.