ArticleScientific reports2026
The peak shifting electricity consumption management and influencing factors of smart grid from recurrent neural network model and deep learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study uses Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) model and Electricity Consumption (EC) management model to conduct in-depth research and analysis to achieve effective management of peak shifting EC in smart grids and analyze its influencing factors. A management method that is superior to other models has been found, which has a breakthrough effect on the use and research of smart grids. Firstly, the RNN model is analyzed, and a smart grid energy consumption prediction model based on EC management of peak shifting is established. Secondly, with the goal of shifting peaks and filling valleys, the power load data with several different characteristics is divided into different EC modes. Finally, in predicting smart grid energy consumption, it is compared with Linear Regression (LR), nonlinear regression, and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average Mode prediction models. The results show that: (1) Before using the hydrogen energy peak shifting and valley filling EC management mode, the peak energy consumption is about 46kWh, and the adjusted peak energy consumption decreases by about 12kWh. This indicates that the hydrogen peak shifting EC management mode operates well in smart grids. (2) In practical environments, the Mean Square Error (MSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) values of the RNN-based energy consumption time series prediction model are 0.124, 0.26, and 5.75, respectively. The MSE, MAE, and MAPE values of the LR prediction model are 22.09, 3.33, and 21.48, respectively. The MSE, MAE, and MAPE values of the nonlinear regression prediction model are 0.223, 489, and 16.32, respectively, indicating that the prediction accuracy of the RNN energy consumption time series prediction model is superior to other comparative models. This study has important reference value for schools and factories to use artificial intelligence to elucidate future energy consumption needs and reasonable allocation of energy in the power grid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.