ArticleScientific reports2026
An evaluation system for regional cultural suitability of urban cross-river bridges: insights into the liberation bridge in Tianjin.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban bridges serve not only as transportation infrastructure but also as essential carriers of urban culture. However, existing bridge evaluation systems primarily focus on engineering performance and functional benefits, lacking systematic methods for assessing bridges' cultural suitability. This study pioneers integrating cultural suitability into a comprehensive bridge evaluation system, establishing a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to evaluate bridges' cultural appropriateness. The method constructs an evaluation index system across six dimensions: spatial accessibility, network convenience, bridge quality, spatial integration, traffic rationality, and interactive participation, evaluating bridges' cultural suitability through both quantitative and qualitative approaches. Using the Tianjin Liberation Bridge as a case study, the assessment results show an overall cultural suitability score of 4.054, with strong performance in artistic quality (4.323) and spatial integration (4.247), aligning with the bridge's status as a historical landmark of Tianjin's port opening and an urban cultural icon. Through cross-validation of expert assessments and public questionnaire surveys, the evaluation system demonstrates strong performance in the comprehensiveness of indicator selection, operability of the assessment process, and accuracy of evaluation results. This evaluation system provides new perspectives and decision-making basis for urban bridge planning, design, and renovation, holding significant theoretical and practical implications for promoting the coordinated development of bridge construction and urban culture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.