ArticleScientific reports2026
AI-assisted multimodal assessment for right ventricular function from echocardiography predicts mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep Learning for Cardiac Wall Motion Analysis: A Review of Methods, Challenges, and Clinical Applications.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Right ventricular (RV) strain is an important factor in evaluating RV function. This study aimed to predict mortality in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and right heart failure (RHF) using an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted multimodal echocardiography approach. A total of 586 patients with PH and RHF were enrolled. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed either before hospital admission in the outpatient department or after admission in the inpatient unit. RV structure and function were assessed using two-dimensional measurements and speckle tracking strain analysis of septal and the free-wall segments. A multimodal deep-learning framework, integrating clinical variables, conventional echocardiographic indices, and AI-extracted RV strain features was developed to predict in-hospital and follow-up mortality. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). The death group had significantly higher NT-proBNP levels, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), and average RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) than the survival group. Logistic regression identified PASP and average RVLS as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality, while Cox regression confirmed average RVLS as an independent predictor of follow-up mortality. The testing AUC for the AI model was 0.823 (0.741-0.905). The AI-guided TTE framework provides an effective and efficient method for mortality prediction in patients with PH and RHF, supporting personalized clinical decision-making and risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.