ArticleScientific reports2026
Association of emerging alternatives to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances with polycystic ovary syndrome among Chinese women: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have been previously associated with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). However, the health effects of emerging PFAS alternatives on PCOS remain unclear. This study aims to examine the associations between exposure to emerging PFAS alternatives and the odds of PCOS, while also exploring the combined effects of PFAS mixture exposure. From 2019 to 2024, we conducted a case-control study in Jiangsu Province, China, including 94 women diagnosed with PCOS and 81 healthy controls. Serum concentrations of 25 PFAS were quantified using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Firth penalized maximum likelihood estimation and Bayesian kernel machine regression (BKMR) were used to assess associations between individual PFAS, PFAS mixture, and PCOS, as well as potential interactions among PFAS. After adjusting for potential confounders, 14 PFAS were identified as being associated with PCOS. Specifically, 2 emerging alternatives (FTSA (6/2) and HFPO-DA (GenX)), one precursor (FBSA), one long-chain legacy (PFNA), and 2 short-chain (PFHpA and PFPeS) were positively associated with increased odds of PCOS. HFPO-DA (GenX) exhibited the highest odds ratio (OR: 9.26; 95% CI: 4.16, 20.59). In contrast, the alternative F-53B(8/2) was negatively associated with PCOS (OR: 0.40; 95% CI: 0.25, 0.63). The BKMR model suggested that the PFAS mixture had a significant positive overall effect on PCOS. No significant interactions were observed. This study suggests that environmental exposure to PFAS mixtures was associated with an increased odds of PCOS, particularly with emerging PFAS alternatives. These findings highlight the need for further research on the health effects of PFAS and their regulatory implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.