Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A multicenter evaluation of patients' knowledge of adverse drug reactions.

Emory Egbe Edi, Chinonyerem O Iheanacho, Regina Chimsom Eche, Mabe Dauda, Joy Nuhu Dzingina, Rukaiyat Dauda

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emory Egbe EdiDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Basic and Applied Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Chinonyerem O IheanachoDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Basic and Applied Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. nonye2m@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7690-9024
Regina Chimsom EcheDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Basic and Applied Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Mabe DaudaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Basic and Applied Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Joy Nuhu DzinginaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Basic and Applied Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Rukaiyat DaudaDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Basic and Applied Biological Sciences, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A good knowledge of adverse drug reaction (ADRs) is critical for early identification and prompt reporting, mitigating most of its associated health consequences. This study assessed patients’ knowledge of ADRs and its predictors. A cross-sectional survey of 1,075 patients of five selected tertiary health facilities in five regions of Nigeria was performed using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were performed using SPSS version 25 to determine ADR knowledge level and predictors of the knowledge at 95% confidence interval (p < 0.05). The study showed that 55.5% of respondents had good knowledge of ADRs, while 42.3% had fair knowledge. Residents in Abia State (95%CI = 1.578–4.471; AOR = 2.656; p < 0.001) and participants ≤ 20 years old (95%CI = 1.022–6.206; AOR = 2.518; p = 0.045) were twice more likely to have good knowledge of ADR. Similarly, patients who used prescribed medicines (95%CI = 1.233–2.657; AOR = 1.810; p = 0.002) were almost twice more likely to have good knowledge of ADR. Meanwhile, residence in Abuja (95%CI = 0.170-0.450; AOR = 0.277; p = 0.000) and Bauchi State (95%CI = 0.299-0.831; AOR = 0.499; p = 0.008) were less likely to have good knowledge of ADR. More than half of the Nigerian patients surveyed possessed good knowledge of ADRs and the observed knowledge was significantly predicted by the use of prescribed medicines and socio-demographic factors, particularly, age and State of residence. Therefore, interventions focusing on the observed factors would further improve ADR knowledge and enhance patient safety through early detection, reporting and prompt management.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNigeriaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultADRAdverse drug reactions reportingHealth facilitiesKnowledgeNigeriaPatientsPharmacovigilance

Identifiers

PMID41545478
PMCPMC12881644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.