Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545471›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Integrating random forest-based regression kriging for analyzing spatial variability of rainfall in arid and semi-arid regions.

Marwa Manaf, Zulfiqar Ali, Miklas Scholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marwa ManafCollege of Statistical Sciences, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, Punjab, 54590, Pakistan.
Zulfiqar AliCollege of Statistical Sciences, University of the Punjab, Quaid-e-Azam Campus, Lahore, Punjab, 54590, Pakistan. zulfiqar.stat@pu.edu.pk.
Miklas ScholzDepartment of Civil Engineering Science, University of Johannesburg, Kingsway Campus, PO Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, 2006, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the spatial variability of precipitation is essential for water resource management and climate adaptation, especially in arid and semi-arid regions with strong spatiotemporal heterogeneity. Traditional geostatistical methods, such as ordinary kriging, often struggle to capture nonlinear relationships between rainfall and spatial coordinates. This study focuses on comparing ML-RK methods for spatial interpolation using only latitude and longitude as predictors, rather than developing a full rainfall prediction model. As, machine learning techniques integrated with regression kriging (RK) have wide applications for capturing complex spatial patterns. Therefore, this study evaluates RK combined with six regression models including Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Neural Network (NN), Elastic Net (EN), and Polynomial Regression (PR). In this research, we used monthly and decadal averages of precipitation from 42 meteorological stations (2001-2021) of Pakistan. For assessing optimal spatial structure, four theoretical variogram models including exponential, circular, spherical, and linear-were tested using Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation. Here, the performance of the variogram was assessed using RMSE and MAE. Outcomes associated with this research show that RF-RK consistently outperformed other combinations of ML-RK. Consequently, the combination of ensemble learning and geostatistical interpolation effectively captured both nonlinear relationships and spatial dependencies. The resulting high-resolution rainfall maps can support climate adaptation planning, irrigation scheduling, and sustainable management of water resources in data-scarce regions such as Pakistan.

Indexed as

LOOCVMachine learningPrecipitationRandom forestRegression krigingRF–RK

Identifiers

PMID41545471
PMCPMC12880969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.