ArticleScientific reports2026
The application of a three-dimensional gradient spin‒echo sequence (GRASE) in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the application value of three-dimensional breath-hold gradient spin echo sequence (3D BH-GRASE) in MRCP. We conducted MRCP imaging on 56 patients with pancreatic and biliary diseases via both 3D BH-GRASE and 3D NT-TSE. We compared and statistically analysed the acquisition time, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast ratio (CR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and image quality between the two techniques. The mean image acquisition time of 3D BH-GRASE was 16.4 s, which was significantly shorter than the (238.12 ± 43.85) seconds required for 3D NT-TSE (p < 0.05). Compared with3D NT-TSE, 3D BH-GRASE achieved superior scores in overall image quality, artifacts, and visualization of the common bile duct, hepatic duct, and gallbladder/cystic duct (p < 0.05), but not in the left/right hepatic ducts. In contrast, 3D BH-GRASE was significantly inferior to 3D NT-TSE in visualizing the left and right secondary hepatic ducts (p < 0.05), although not for the pancreatic duct. The image quality scores of the 3D NT-TSE group combined with the 3D BH-GRASE group were significantly greater than those of the individual sequences (p < 0.05). 3D BH-GRASE addresses image quality concerns arising from motion artefacts in 3D NT-TSE and serves as a valuable supplementary imaging modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.