Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545432›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

AI anxiety and adoption intention in higher education based on an extended TAM-UTAUT and PLS-SEM analysis.

Cao Kai, Wang Ping, Jiang Xiaomin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cao KaiLibrary of Qinghai University, Qinghai University, Xining, China. caokai19910101@gmail.com.
Wang PingSchool of International Education, Qinghai Minzu University, Xining, China.
Jiang XiaominChengdu Aeronautic Polytechnic University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to deconstruct the complex relationship between artificial intelligence anxiety and generative AI adoption intention in the context of higher education. An extended analytical framework is constructed by integrating the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). Taking faculty and students from three universities in Sichuan Province as the research objects, data are collected through a questionnaire survey, and empirical research is conducted using the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Focusing on three dimensions of AI anxiety—AI learning anxiety, AI sociotechnical blindness anxiety, and AI job displacement anxiety—the study systematically examines their indirect impact paths on adoption intention through mediating variables such as performance expectancy and effort expectancy, and investigates the moderating effects of disciplinary background and AI self-efficacy. The findings reveal that AI anxiety exhibits a significant “double-edged sword” effect on generative AI adoption intention: AI job displacement anxiety comprehensively inhibits the core variables of technology acceptance; in contrast, AI sociotechnical blindness anxiety not only positively promotes effort expectancy and adoption intention but also negatively affects performance expectancy. In the technology acceptance mechanism, effort expectancy and social influence are the factors driving adoption intention, while disciplinary background and AI self-efficacy regulate the transmission paths of anxiety by shaping cognitive paradigms and psychological resources. The theoretical value of this study lies in breaking through the simplistic inhibition hypothesis of emotional factors in technology acceptance research. Practically, it provides empirical evidence for higher education institutions to formulate differentiated AI training strategies.

Indexed as

Adoption intentionAI anxietyExtended TAM-UTAUTHigher educationPLS-SEM

Identifiers

PMID41545432
PMCPMC12881405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.