ArticleScientific reports2026
Investigating property-porosity relationships for micro-architected lattice structures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Micro-architected structures are increasingly valued for their light weight and tunable mechanical properties; this class of material includes sheet structures like the Schöen gyroid and beam lattices like the octet. For design purposes, it is critical to understand how to tune the relative density (RD) to obtain desired mechanical properties. This study investigates the mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V gyroid structures, spanning a broad range of RDs (0.03-0.90), unit cell sizes (1-4 cm), and sheet thicknesses (0.2-7.8 mm). Results demonstrate that the classical Gibson-Ashby power law scaling between RD and modulus and yield stress does not adequately capture the response over a wide range of RDs, nor does it extrapolate correctly to the fully dense solid. Analytical models, in concert with experimental results and high-fidelity finite element calculations, show that the deviation from Gibson-Ashby reflects a transition from structure-dominated to material-dominated behavior. Distinctions are drawn between scaling relationships and property-porosity models, and an analytical model is proposed to better capture the evolution of mechanical properties with RD. These observations are mirrored in other architected topologies, like the octet, and highlight the importance of understanding the relationship between mechanical properties and geometry for design purposes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.