ArticleScientific reports2026
A modified Dung Beetle optimizer for combined heat and power economic dispatch considering power losses, valve-point effects, and operating constraints.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Combined Heat and Power Economic Dispatch (CHPED) problem represents a significant optimization challenge in modern power systems due to its inherent complexity arising from multiple operational constraints. This complexity is further exacerbated when considering the effect of power losses (PLs), valve-point loading effect (VPLE), and prohibited operating zones (POZs). Consequently, an efficient and robust optimization algorithm is essential for obtaining a globally optimal solution while satisfying all constraints. To address these challenges, this work evaluates the effectiveness of the Modified Dung Beetle Optimizer (MDBO) for solving the CHPED problem, considering PLs, VPLE, and POZs. The MDBO enhances the search process and mitigates the limitations of the conventional Dung Beetle Optimizer, particularly stagnation and premature convergence to local optima. The novelty in this paper is proposing a modified version of the traditional DBO (MDBO) by integrating three improvement strategies, including the fitness distance balance (FDB), Chaotic mutation (CM), and adaptive local search approach (ALSA), to solve the CHPED problem. The proposed MDBO has the ability to overcome the shortcomings of traditional DBO, such as its premature convergence and tendency to local optima. The effectiveness of the proposed MDBO has been evaluated on CHPED problems involving 4-unit, 7-unit, 24-unit, and 48-unit systems under various operating conditions. Moreover, MDBO performance has been rigorously assessed using standard benchmark test suites, including CEC-2019. The results demonstrate a significant reduction in operating costs, confirming the superior performance of the MDBO in comparison to existing optimization techniques like Sand Cat Swarm Optimizer (SCSO), African vultures optimization algorithm (AVOA), Sine Cosine Algorithm (SCA), Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO), Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), Liver cancer algorithm (LCA), Zebra Optimizer Algorithm (ZOA), and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA). Furthermore, the proposed algorithm consistently outperforms alternative methods reported in the literature, offering a more efficient and reliable solution for CHPED optimization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.