ArticleBMJ mental health2026
Development and external validation of machine learning approaches for risk prediction of cardiovascular disease in individuals with schizophrenia: a nationwide Swedish and Danish study.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From acute diagnosis to longitudinal risk stratification: a paradigm shift in the clinical role of cardiac biomarkers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently available cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction tools may underestimate the risk in individuals with schizophrenia.
objectiveTo develop and externally validate 5-year CVD risk prediction models for people with schizophrenia using large-scale register data in Sweden and Denmark with a machine learning (ML) approach.
methodsIndividuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, aged 30 and older and without prior CVD, were followed for up to 5 years. We investigated whether adding additional health-related and socio-demographic predictors to the established CVD risk factors improved predictions and compared ML models with logistic regression. External validation was performed across countries.
findingsA lasso penalised logistic regression including additional predictors achieved the highest predictive performance, both on Swedish and Danish data, while complex ML models with interaction terms did not provide additional improvements. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the internal validation data was 0.745 (95% CI (0.742 to 0.749)) in the Swedish model, and 0.722, 95% CI (0.719 to 0.726) in the Danish model. External validation showed similar performance, yielding an AUC of 0.746, 95% CI (0.741 to 0.751) using the Danish model on the Swedish data, and an AUC of 0.720, 95% CI (0.712 to 0.726) using the Swedish model on the Danish validation data.
conclusionsIncorporating additional health-related information, such as psychiatric comorbidities and medication use, improved 5-year CVD risk prediction for people with schizophrenia in both countries. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The models can be deployed between Denmark and Sweden without loss of performance compared with training a model on each country.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.