Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545227›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2026

Development and external validation of machine learning approaches for risk prediction of cardiovascular disease in individuals with schizophrenia: a nationwide Swedish and Danish study.

Sara Dorthea Nielsen, Maja Dobrosavljevic, Pontus Andell, Zheng Chang, Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen, Henrik Larsson, Michael Eriksen Benros

Abstract readEvaluation StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara Dorthea NielsenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9272-7466
Maja DobrosavljevicSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden maja.dobrosavljevic@oru.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3887-9669
Pontus AndellDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2759-1379
Zheng ChangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8087-1417
Line Katrine Harder ClemmensenDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5527-5798
Henrik LarssonSchool of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-3297
Michael Eriksen BenrosCopenhagen Research Center for Biological and Precision Psychiatry, Mental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4939-9465

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently available cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk prediction tools may underestimate the risk in individuals with schizophrenia.

objectiveTo develop and externally validate 5-year CVD risk prediction models for people with schizophrenia using large-scale register data in Sweden and Denmark with a machine learning (ML) approach.

methodsIndividuals with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, aged 30 and older and without prior CVD, were followed for up to 5 years. We investigated whether adding additional health-related and socio-demographic predictors to the established CVD risk factors improved predictions and compared ML models with logistic regression. External validation was performed across countries.

findingsA lasso penalised logistic regression including additional predictors achieved the highest predictive performance, both on Swedish and Danish data, while complex ML models with interaction terms did not provide additional improvements. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the internal validation data was 0.745 (95% CI (0.742 to 0.749)) in the Swedish model, and 0.722, 95% CI (0.719 to 0.726) in the Danish model. External validation showed similar performance, yielding an AUC of 0.746, 95% CI (0.741 to 0.751) using the Danish model on the Swedish data, and an AUC of 0.720, 95% CI (0.712 to 0.726) using the Swedish model on the Danish validation data.

conclusionsIncorporating additional health-related information, such as psychiatric comorbidities and medication use, improved 5-year CVD risk prediction for people with schizophrenia in both countries. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The models can be deployed between Denmark and Sweden without loss of performance compared with training a model on each country.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular DiseasesModels, CardiovascularPredictive Learning ModelsRisk AssessmentSchizophreniaAdultAgedArea Under CurveDenmarkFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesPsychiatrySchizophreniaSchizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders

Identifiers

PMID41545227
PMCPMC12815116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.