Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41545042›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Sources, impacts and mechanisms of non-pharmacological artefacts in processed electroencephalography monitoring during anaesthesia and intensive care: a scoping review protocol.

Alina Beg, Clara Namhee Kim, Alan Tung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alina BegSimon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4490-6933
Clara Namhee KimThe University of British Columbia Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-7437-6242
Alan TungThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada alantung@alumni.ubc.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4907-1278

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcessed electroencephalography (pEEG) monitoring is commonly employed to assess the level of hypnosis under anaesthesia, although it is susceptible to various non-brain-related artefacts. Several sources of artefacts have been published, but how these sources affect the pEEG and their related hypnotic indices have not been summarised before. This scoping review will summarise the published literature on how non-pharmacological artefacts affect pEEG monitoring during anaesthesia andintensive care, including their influence on the hypnotic index and the underlying mechanisms of interference. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Non-pharmacological, non-brain-related sources of artefacts affecting human patients under anaesthesia or intensive care will be included. The covered concepts include the sources of interference affecting pEEG in which the artefact causes the hypnotic index to no longer be reflective of the depth of hypnosis, how they affect the hypnotic index, and the suspected mechanism by which they affect the pEEG monitor. Databases to be searched will include PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and the Web of Science. Grey literature will include sources from Google Scholar, the Web of Science, preprint repositories and reference lists of included studies and review papers. The search will be conducted on 19 June 2025, followed by a later repeat search for new articles once the data from the initial search have been extracted. The search will be limited to English articles. Search results will be imported into Covidence for screening. Data extraction will be conducted by two extractors independently, and the data will be summarised in tables. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: There are no ethical or safety concerns associated with this study. Ethics approval was not obtained as this scoping review will summarise data from previously published sources, and the findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaArtifactsCritical CareElectroencephalographyHumansHypnosisResearch DesignScoping Reviews as TopicANAESTHETICSElectroencephalographyIntensive Care UnitsINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE

Identifiers

PMID41545042
PMCPMC12815180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.